Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney are not the candidates the Republicans THINK THEY ARE, let's face it, the ELITE CLASS have sold us a bill of goods concerning Gingrich and Romney. When are we going to wake up and smell it FOR WHAT IT IS, SOCIALISM!?
He [Gingrich] voted YES can you believe this? To the creation of the Department of Education, which is unconstitutional to start with. This department has been a money wasting nightmare since its inception, which was its purpose and shows no amount of change to come. American education has gone down hill ever since this VOTE AND THAT IS A PROVABLE FACT!
It must be remembered here that all the schools in the Soviet Union were under the same kind of system and were eradicated slowly but surely of all remnants of religious vestige, can't you see that here, their trying to destroy our heritage by rewriting history?
It is amazing to me just how blind we as a people have become, we ignore the obvious because they have connected so much of a return for keeping quiet while they bankrupt us. Welfare seems humane but it breaks our backs economically every hour of every day! The Progressives of whom Gingrich and Romney are proud supporters take the legs out from under our economy by breaking banks, extending welfare, and
Students were then taught the basis of Marxist materialism, inter nationalism and general ethics of the new Socialist Society and in some places these tenants are taught to American students in a 'totally good light' neglecting of course to tell them how BADLY SOCIALISM FAILS EVERY TIME!
Gingrich voted to designate a whopping 68 million acres of WE THE PEOPLES LAND as Federal protected wilderness, WHICH WE DID NOT THEN AND DO NOT NOW NEED!
Our constitution doesn’t ALLOW nor call for ANY KIND OF land “control" by the Federal Government! But think about it, the Fed MUST CONTROL TWO THINGS IN ORDER TO CONTROL US, LAND AND GUNS!
The communist manifesto states that the state must have an abolition of all property and land and application of all rents of land to public purposes, control is the name of the game.
The communist manifesto states that the state must have an abolition of all property and land and application of all rents of land to public purposes, control is the name of the game.
Federal Land grabs today are huge percentages of the 13 western states that are now federally owned.
HR 1505 is the greatest federal land grab in history
"Look at this: It's a map of how much land is owned in America by the federal government. They own nearly 650 million acres of land — almost 30 percent of the land area of the United States.
But look at how it's distributed: It's overwhelmingly in the West. Nevada is almost 90 percent federally owned land. Alaska is nearly three quarters federally owned. Compare that to the East. States are in the single digits. Even Texas is only 2 percent federally owned land.
Why isn't government rushing to "protect" land in, say, Connecticut or New Jersey? Let me show you this: our national resources in comparison to federally owned land. It seems the land we are protecting is also the most oil and natural resource rich land.
Here's another map: Shale oil is found around the world but the largest deposits by far are in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming. Last year, government went after 9 million acres of land in the West in the name of saving the wild horses and stopping any activities that "would destroy the area's special character."
Right.
If we tapped these areas, we could be closer to energy independence. You want to pay off the debt? The West is Fort Knox.
The house is on fire! Why wouldn't they drill there instead of crossing their fingers and hoping someone creates a car that runs on magic fairy dust? I'm not even saying for oil — natural gas! Natural gas.
We are going to go down in the world history books as a suicidal nation. When we lose everything, do you think Russia won't come over here and protect this land and resources better than we do? It's a suicide mission. We as citizens must stop hoping for change. We must pray for it and demand change. This course is unsustainable.
Here's the latest land grab and we only know this because of a memo that was leaked: The Obama administration is pursuing 13 million acres through 11 states in the West in the name of "national monuments." Maybe we'll get one of Chairman Mao? How about Stalin? He was good at controlling the lands, I hear. And they are doing this without telling anyone. It's executive order. They don't care about what you think about it.
Here's another one: Do you like to fish? Well, enjoy it while you can because it looks like special interests once again are trumping common sense and the voice of the people. A new report says it's a move to appease environmental groups and, just like before, without the consent of the people and by executive order.
We told you he would do this. Heck, The New York Times said he'd do it. The report claims that Obama will "no longer listen to the public" as he tries to prohibit U.S. citizens from fishing on some of the nation's oceans, coastal areas, Great Lakes and even some inland waters. So, because a couple of environmentalists want to save the fish, people could lose rights."
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,588789,00.html#ixzz1gHWYXeou
"Look at this: It's a map of how much land is owned in America by the federal government. They own nearly 650 million acres of land — almost 30 percent of the land area of the United States.
But look at how it's distributed: It's overwhelmingly in the West. Nevada is almost 90 percent federally owned land. Alaska is nearly three quarters federally owned. Compare that to the East. States are in the single digits. Even Texas is only 2 percent federally owned land.
Why isn't government rushing to "protect" land in, say, Connecticut or New Jersey? Let me show you this: our national resources in comparison to federally owned land. It seems the land we are protecting is also the most oil and natural resource rich land.
Here's another map: Shale oil is found around the world but the largest deposits by far are in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming. Last year, government went after 9 million acres of land in the West in the name of saving the wild horses and stopping any activities that "would destroy the area's special character."
Right.
If we tapped these areas, we could be closer to energy independence. You want to pay off the debt? The West is Fort Knox.
The house is on fire! Why wouldn't they drill there instead of crossing their fingers and hoping someone creates a car that runs on magic fairy dust? I'm not even saying for oil — natural gas! Natural gas.
We are going to go down in the world history books as a suicidal nation. When we lose everything, do you think Russia won't come over here and protect this land and resources better than we do? It's a suicide mission. We as citizens must stop hoping for change. We must pray for it and demand change. This course is unsustainable.
Here's the latest land grab and we only know this because of a memo that was leaked: The Obama administration is pursuing 13 million acres through 11 states in the West in the name of "national monuments." Maybe we'll get one of Chairman Mao? How about Stalin? He was good at controlling the lands, I hear. And they are doing this without telling anyone. It's executive order. They don't care about what you think about it.
Here's another one: Do you like to fish? Well, enjoy it while you can because it looks like special interests once again are trumping common sense and the voice of the people. A new report says it's a move to appease environmental groups and, just like before, without the consent of the people and by executive order.
We told you he would do this. Heck, The New York Times said he'd do it. The report claims that Obama will "no longer listen to the public" as he tries to prohibit U.S. citizens from fishing on some of the nation's oceans, coastal areas, Great Lakes and even some inland waters. So, because a couple of environmentalists want to save the fish, people could lose rights."
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,588789,00.html#ixzz1gHWYXeou
The communist manifesto is a warning to Americans to VOTE out every progressive that's REGRESSING US TO NOTHING in the eyes of the world:
Land controls, Progressive Income Tax, Termination of Inheritance, Central Bank which is the Federal Reserve and
Control of the Education of our children, THESE ARE THE HALL MARKS OF A PROGRESSIVE IDEAL one that will destroy America if we don't act NOW!!
In 1994 old Newt voted for it right down the line without a flinch of conservative common sense:
Yes to the National Endowment for the Arts, now that's a great vote, don't you think? To allow a group to insult Christ by putting a cross in a jar of urine and calling it Art while defending Islam against similar insult, what's wrong with putting a Koran in a Toilet and calling it art?
He thought a YES vote for 1.2 billion for UN peacekeeping was a great idea, yeah; people without guns protecting us all, great Idea Newt! The U.N. was the biggest flop since the 'League of Nations' the brain child of non other than Woodrow Wilson!
He voted Yes for the 'presidential line item veto', which sounds good on the outside but never seems to used in the way they say it will, they can TAKE OUT the good stuff and stuff the pork in just as easily as take out the bad stuff which they never do!
He voted Yes for the 'presidential line item veto', which sounds good on the outside but never seems to used in the way they say it will, they can TAKE OUT the good stuff and stuff the pork in just as easily as take out the bad stuff which they never do!
Yes again for 13 billion in foreign aid instead of fixing America, most all aid other than for true allies like Israel is wasted money down the progressive RAT HOLE! We support stupid and useless things of no import to Americans, making our enemies stronger and our Alies weaker!
The aid is more or less supporting Foreign Banks, Dictators and funding militant Islamic groups who hate us and Israel.
The aid is more or less supporting Foreign Banks, Dictators and funding militant Islamic groups who hate us and Israel.
He voted for 166 million more for the IRS, a group of unfeeling militant soldiers of the Federal Government, does that even sound conservative to you? It shouldn't, its progressive to the core!
Newt led Congress into GATT with fellow CFR member Bill Clinton and then stated that it was a very big transfer of power, no kidding!
Why was it a BIG transfer of power? Because it completely went against Article 1, Section 8 of the constitution of the United States, but what does Newt care about the Constitution anyway, he uses it only when its good for his agenda.
What GATT does is to reduce the amount of money we can save for OUR OWN pensions.
He TOLD THEN President Clinton in New Hampshire that he was a huge fan of FDR and Woodrow Wilson, two of the most despised early communist leaning presidents, this ALONE is enough to take him OFF THE VOTER ROLES FOR ME.
Just Remember that bastard Woodrow Wilson gave us both the federal reserve and the 16th amendment, income tax without ratification. Why would a Republican Conservative EVER say that is a good thing? Why the hell have that in your BFF list?
What GATT does is to reduce the amount of money we can save for OUR OWN pensions.
He TOLD THEN President Clinton in New Hampshire that he was a huge fan of FDR and Woodrow Wilson, two of the most despised early communist leaning presidents, this ALONE is enough to take him OFF THE VOTER ROLES FOR ME.
Just Remember that bastard Woodrow Wilson gave us both the federal reserve and the 16th amendment, income tax without ratification. Why would a Republican Conservative EVER say that is a good thing? Why the hell have that in your BFF list?
He also voted for China to be the Most Favored Nation for trade WOW, OUR enemy voted Most Favored, how wonderful, NO WONDER THEY OWN US!
And can you imagine? He voted to allow federal funding loan guarantees for greater trade with Red China, a one sided trade deficit that we've never recovered from. Conservative my ass!
And can you imagine? He voted to allow federal funding loan guarantees for greater trade with Red China, a one sided trade deficit that we've never recovered from. Conservative my ass!
He voted to supply funds to subsidize trade with the Soviets, another enemy, he only made it easier to infiltrate us and make them richer in the process.
"A subsidy (also known as a subvention) is an assistance paid to a business or economic sector. Most subsidies are made by the government to producers or distributors in an industry to prevent the decline of that industry (e.g., as a result of continuous unprofitable operations) or an increase in the prices of its products or simply to encourage it to hire more labor (as in the case of a wage subsidy).
Examples are subsidies to encourage the sale of exports; subsidies on some foods to keep down the cost of living, especially in urban areas; and subsidies to encourage the expansion of farm production and achieve self-reliance in food production.
Subsidies can be regarded as a form of protectionism or trade barrier by making domestic goods and services artificially competitive against imports. Subsidies may distort markets, and can impose large economic costs. Financial assistance in the form of a subsidy may come from one's government, but the term subsidy may also refer to assistance granted by others, such as individuals or non-governmental institutions."
FROM HERE
"A subsidy (also known as a subvention) is an assistance paid to a business or economic sector. Most subsidies are made by the government to producers or distributors in an industry to prevent the decline of that industry (e.g., as a result of continuous unprofitable operations) or an increase in the prices of its products or simply to encourage it to hire more labor (as in the case of a wage subsidy).
Examples are subsidies to encourage the sale of exports; subsidies on some foods to keep down the cost of living, especially in urban areas; and subsidies to encourage the expansion of farm production and achieve self-reliance in food production.
Subsidies can be regarded as a form of protectionism or trade barrier by making domestic goods and services artificially competitive against imports. Subsidies may distort markets, and can impose large economic costs. Financial assistance in the form of a subsidy may come from one's government, but the term subsidy may also refer to assistance granted by others, such as individuals or non-governmental institutions."
FROM HERE
Thanks to Newt 2.2 million acres in Idaho are no longer available for us to own privately its now Wilderness status. Newt is nothing but a greedy progressive Land grabber!
He actually voted for your taxpayer money to be be available to foreign governments through export/import banks, now that's insane. What true conservative would ever allow OUR money to stolen by overseas banks? Apparently Newt the progressive rat fink!
He is pro amnesty – Joe Galloway wrote in December 2010 that both Newt and Jeb Bush were both pro-amnesty. Amnesty is an excuse to make legal the Illegal, and making them our children to support. But just like Congress we can't claim them as dependants on our taxes.
Gingrich stated, “We are not going to deport 11 million immigrants.” Progressives have a bad habit of UNDERSTATING the problems they've caused, its closer to 40,000,000 ILLEGAL LAW BREAKERS who have no right to be here....period!
What they term Immigrants the Law terms a Criminal no matter how small or pitiful they seem. Those who fight to be legal the right way should be angry that so many do not do it the way they had to do it. I don't know about you but if I earn what's mine I feel so proud to have it!
Gingrich stated, “We are not going to deport 11 million immigrants.” Progressives have a bad habit of UNDERSTATING the problems they've caused, its closer to 40,000,000 ILLEGAL LAW BREAKERS who have no right to be here....period!
What they term Immigrants the Law terms a Criminal no matter how small or pitiful they seem. Those who fight to be legal the right way should be angry that so many do not do it the way they had to do it. I don't know about you but if I earn what's mine I feel so proud to have it!
He is pro foreign aid. In 1995 he voted for 31.8 billion in foreign aid, but wouldn’t vote to cut foreign aid by a measly 1%, a typical progressive. There is NOTHING about Newt that sounds in the least bit conservative, its a mask he wares to hide his agendas!
Now what about Mitt Romney? Is he any better? Suffice it to say he's just as much a progressive to the core! There are problems with every candidate out there but we cannot keep going back to the same garbage can for change, progressives WILL NEVER BE DIFFERENT they just wear different masks and do the same stupid things!
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment